MGMT5908: Strategic HRM ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW (2024, term 3)
ASSESSMENT TASK % % LENGTH DUE DATE
1. Weekly quiz 25
a. Weekly quiz • Weeks 1-5, 7-10. Assigned Monday, 4pm and due Wednesday, 4pm
2. Strategies file 1 20
i) Video submission 17 10 minutes • Week 5: Tuesday 8 October, 4pm
ii) Admire suggestions 3 • Week 7: Monday 21 October, 4pm
3. Strategies file 2 35
i) Written file 2000 words • Week 10: Monday 11 November, 4pm
4. Examination 20 • UNSW exam period ASSESSMENT 1: QUIZZES PURPOSE Every quiz targets to help you to read the week’s assigned readings before the lecture. The readings give you the core files required to gain the most from this route. So, your pre-reading will enable the lectures and tutorials to provide elevated label for all by extending upon that foundation. Participation in lectures and tutorials will thus be making an allowance for refining this core files and applying the concepts. FORMAT AND SUBMISSION Format
• In weeks 1-5, and 7-10, a ten search files from quiz shall be made accessible by means of the Moodle enviornment web residence on Monday at 4pm. Every quiz will discontinuance forty eight hours later on Wednesday at 4pm.
• Ten minutes are allocated to entire every quiz. • Every quiz would possibly maybe maybe well enjoy extra than one-preference, appropriate/false, or brief answer questions. • The ranking of your most attention-grabbing eight quizzes shall be summed to provide an total label. • Every quiz incorporates questions about the deliver material of the week’s readings. Thus, you would possibly maybe maybe well perhaps serene
put together by reading the assigned readings, taking notes in reveal to occupy interplay in active learning (to toughen recall and determining of what became read), and be optimistic that you just predict questions at the same time as you discontinuance no longer realize any of the materials.
Submission • By technique of a link all the scheme by the route Moodle residence (https://moodle.telt.usa.edu.au/login/index.php) • There’s no longer this form of thing as a chance to retake the quiz or discontinuance a quiz that you just missed except an application
for Particular Considerations is made and authorized.
ASSESSMENT 2: RECOMMENDATIONS REPORT 1 PURPOSE To analyse an organisation and plan SHRM concepts acceptable to it. TOPIC You would possibly maybe maybe use the weeks 1-4 route materials to answer to the search files from:
What approach would possibly maybe maybe well serene the organisation absorb its strategic HRM actions? You would possibly maybe maybe analyse one amongst the next organisations.
• College of Technology Sydney (www.usaedu.au/) • Foundation Energy (www.originenergy.com.au/) • Westpac (www.westpac.com.au/) • McDonalds Australia (https://mcdonalds.com.au/) • Accenture (www.accenture.com/au-en) • NSW Division of Smartly being (www.health.nsw.gov.au/)
i) Identify organisational strengths, weaknesses, alternatives and threats (SWOT) relevant to SHRM
• That you would possibly maybe serene establish the organisation’s SWOT and the SHRM implications of your SWOT. • You would possibly maybe maybe moreover hide as many SHRM implications as you require.
ii) Present concepts for SHRM improvement • Outline SHRM concepts that waft from the SHRM implications you diagnosed. • Invent optimistic you elaborate these and establish explicit actions that will toughen effectiveness.
FORMAT AND SUBMISSION: VIDEO REPORT Overview You would possibly maybe maybe submit your particular individual file as a 10 minute video. Evaluation criteria
• Admire “Marking rubric for Represent 1”. Formatting requirements:
• Most length of 10 minutes. • It would possibly maybe maybe maybe well serene encompass files and principle. • Inclusion of charts and photos would possibly maybe maybe well be natty.
Submission • Put up your video file by means of the link on the route Moodle residence.
FORMAT AND SUBMISSION: VIDEO PEER REVIEW AND FEEDBACK Overview You would possibly maybe maybe provide suggestions on the video file of three classmates who examined thoroughly different organisations than yours. This enable you to be taught from your understand’s insights, formulation to analysing organisations, and presentation fashion. Thus, the understand review job will help you arrange your Represent 2 by confirming at the same time as you are drawing discontinuance your organisational diagnosis in the lovely route or at the same time as you wish to be extra explicit alongside with your concepts and their justifications. Evaluation criteria
• You would possibly maybe maybe receive a label (saunter/fail) per the quality of written understand suggestions you provide Submission
• By technique of the route Moodle residence (https://moodle.telt.usa.edu.au/login/index.php) • There are no longer any extensions accessible for understand suggestions
ASSESSMENT 3: RECOMMENDATIONS REPORT 2 PURPOSE This project provides an opportunity for you to display cloak your excessive level of determining of the route materials covered to this point (especially weeks 5-8). TOPIC Prepare an evidence-primarily primarily based mostly diagnosis of the largest plight that one or extra organisations face and a persuasive utter of HR concepts for what occupy to be accomplished to tackle the plight you diagnosed. EVIDENCE FOR THE ANALYSES You would possibly maybe maybe be to blame for figuring out improve your diagnosis by drawing upon: • Route concepts in the readings/lectures/tutorials • Insights from at the very least 5 tutorial journal articles • Publicly accessible organisational files / publications.
Moreover to, you are invited to enhance your diagnosis by alongside with files you for my section regain (e.g., interviews, emailed questions, surveys) from one or extra of the next folks to reveal the file: • HR managers, • Employees (future / original / faded), • Line managers, and/or • Senior managers
STRUCTURE Represent 2 occupy to be designed around two valuable substances: Allotment 1: Analyse the organisation’s characteristics and ambiance to construct a robust case for why the diagnosed plight(s) occupy to be focused upon (versus choices) and that clearly identifies the substances of the plight that are the most relevant to attain.
The next are simply illustrative examples of subjects that will maybe well be addressed. Nonetheless you can moreover and would possibly maybe maybe well take grasp of into story choices subjects because the aptitude focal level of your diagnosis: • AI • Demographic exchange • A low enhance economy • Low productivity • Low unemployment
Allotment 2. Basically based upon your Allotment 1 insights, provide actionable concepts for those that develop and/or enforce HRM.
As an instance, you can: • Identify how HR skills and behaviours relevant to the disorders diagnosed in Allotment 1 can even be
developed • Snort about explicit improved outcomes that you just would predict from these enhanced HR skills
and behaviours
SUBMISSION AND EVALUATION CRITERIA Formatting requirements:
• 12pt Times Contemporary Roman font • Net page numbers and zPass on page 1
Submission
• Put up your file by means of the Turnitin link in your Moodle route residence. • Late submissions incur a deduction of 10% of the project weighting for day to day slack.
Every day is calculated because the 24-hour period following the submission due time. This contains Saturdays and Sundays.
• Extensions to points in time are granted most attention-grabbing in distinctive conditions and the attach supporting documentation is equipped. Requests are made by means of the special consideration job. https://student.usa.edu.au/special-consideration
REPORT STRUCTURE INCLUDED IN WORD LIMIT
RECOMMENDED LENGTH
Title page: Consist of title, name, student quantity, be conscious length, tutor name, tutorial day and time.
As wanted
Desk of contents: Compose no longer encompass. – –
Introduction: Prove scope and route of the file. Spotlight explicit disorders you would possibly maybe maybe hide.
Approx. 100 words
Allotment 1: Identification of key disorders
Approx. 800 words
Allotment 2: Strategies
Approx. 1000 words
Conclusion: Combine disorders covered in the file by explaining the valuable argument and highlight key subject matters.
Approx. 100 words
References: Consist of sources cited in the file. Moreover to to citing concepts from the textbook, you wish at the very least two extra tutorial references to enhance your diagnosis.
As wanted
Two extra tutorial references
(1) Appendix. Right here’s non-well-known nonetheless prompt. I faded, occupy to be referred to all the scheme by your file.
As wanted
ASSESSMENT 4: EXAM Due date To be announced from the usa examination timetable Weighting 20% Format Written submission Dimension To be announced Submission By potential in actual fact Moodle web residence
DETAILS The purpose of the exam is to think your determining of the route concepts that you just have been exposed to all the scheme by the Term. All enviornment cloth in the route is examinable. Thus, winding up all readings and celebrated lecture and tutorial attendance are wanted in making ready. Further crucial aspects about the examination shall be equipped on Moodle later in the Term.
MARKING RUBRIC FOR REPORT 1 CRITERIA % FAIL PASS CREDIT DISTINCTION HIGH DISTINCTION
1. Conversation: Organisation and readability Contain you organised your file effectively?
20 Disorganised and incoherent, reminiscent of no linking between sections/arguments, or there is no longer this form of thing as a introduction/ conclusion to the file.
Some strive to organise in a logical manner, and affordable readability.
Logical organisation, coherent and largely clear.
Careful consideration to detail with organisation and readability.
Reveals a complex and insightful formulation to the file organisation, with compelling readability.
2. Conversation (talking) Contain you presented the materials with readability?
20 Spoken language is unclear and/or central message complex to account for
Spoken language is continually clear nonetheless continuously substances miserable be conscious preference, deliver projection and/or lack of variation in tone
Spoken language is clear and easily understood by listener.
Spoken language is clear and concise, and makes use of effective tone, pacing and emphasis to elaborate key message
Spoken language is clear concise and compelling, delivered in an participating fashion and effectively conveying key message
3. Applies SHRM concepts Contain you explained your organisation with SHRM concepts? Contain you faded SHRM concepts to analyse the wretchedness in residence of beautiful describing the deliver material?
20 Does no longer talk about with any route concepts. Does no longer apply route concepts, or application is inaccurate.
Introduces route concepts nonetheless would no longer prove them adequately. Applies route concepts accurately nonetheless would possibly maybe maybe well encompass minor errors or omissions.
Introduces and explains route concepts adequately. Accurately applies route concepts.
Introduces and explains route concepts comprehensively. Accurately and insightfully applies route concepts.
Introduces and explains route concepts comprehensively, demonstrating a breadth and depth of determining. Accurately and insightfully applies route concepts.
4. Creates explicit concepts Are your concepts explicit and sensible?
20 Does no longer plan concepts or creates sone nonetheless the concepts are no longer explicit and sensible.
Entails some concepts accurately nonetheless there would possibly maybe maybe well be errors or omissions.
Entails concepts nonetheless they’ve to be extra explicit and sensible.
Accurately and insightfully contains concepts that are explicit and sensible.
Accurately and insightfully contains explicit and sensible concepts, demonstrating a breadth and depth of determining about the organisation.
5. Makes use of evidence to plight- clear up Contain you faded quantitative or qualitative evidence to enhance your arguments?
20 No evidence or repeats evidence with no diagnosis. Basically descriptive without reference to principle and evidence, lacks sufficient diagnosis to enhance conclusion
Introduces some evidence nonetheless fails to clearly link this to diagnosis or conclusion
Applies some evidence to reveal judgement, reflects on strengths of the evidence and links this to diagnosis or conclusions
Insightful and detailed evidence equipped. Applies evidence and contains lovely interpretation of qualitative and quantitative files to reveal judgement and clear conclusions
Applies evidence, alongside with lovely interpretation of files, reflects on evidence to reveal diagnosis of alternatives and threats, provides sensible conclusions
MARKING RUBRIC FOR REPORT 2 CRITERIA % FAIL PASS CREDIT DISTINCTION HIGH DISTINCTION
1. Written communication: Organisation, readability and grammar Contain you organised your file effectively? Contain presented the materials with readability?
15 Disorganised and incoherent, reminiscent of no linking between sections/arguments, or there is no longer this form of thing as a introduction/ conclusion to the file.
Some strive to organise in a logical manner, and affordable readability of expression.
Logical organisation, coherent and largely written clearly.
Careful consideration to detail with organisation and written readability.
Reveals a complex and insightful formulation to the file organisation, with compelling readability of expression.
2. Written communication: Referencing and formatting Contain you referenced as per UNSW requirements? Contain you formatted as per the route Assessments guiding principle?
15 Referencing is absent or would no longer conform to UNSW requirements; &/or file would no longer consistently conform to formatting requirements.
Referencing and/or formatting has systematic errors (e.g. inconsistency in how authors are referenced), nonetheless valuable principles are serene intact.
Referencing and formatting is largely lovely, nonetheless with some errors (e.g. dinky inconsistencies in how authors are referenced).
Referencing and formatting is beautiful, with about a minor errors (e.g. Reference List no longer alphabetised or be conscious length pretty over)
Referencing and formatting is consistently lovely.
3. Applies route concepts: Contain you explained your organisation with route concepts? Contain you faded route concepts to analyse the wretchedness in residence of beautiful describing the deliver material?
30 Does no longer talk about with any route concepts. Does no longer apply route concepts, or application is inaccurate.
Introduces route concepts nonetheless would no longer prove them adequately. Applies route concepts accurately nonetheless would possibly maybe maybe well encompass minor errors or omissions.
Introduces and explains route concepts adequately. Accurately applies route concepts.
Introduces and explains route concepts comprehensively. Accurately and insightfully applies route concepts.
Introduces and explains route concepts comprehensively, demonstrating a breadth and depth of determining. Accurately and insightfully applies concepts.
4. Creates concepts that are SMART: Compose your concepts take care of every facet of SMART dreams?
20 Does no longer plan concepts or creates some nonetheless the concepts are no longer SMART.
Entails SMART concepts accurately nonetheless there would possibly maybe maybe well be errors or omissions (e.g. how purpose shall be measured isn’t diagnosed).
Entails SMART concepts nonetheless they’ve to be extra explicit / sensible.
Accurately and insightfully contains concepts that are SMART.
Accurately and insightfully contains concepts that are SMART, demonstrating a breadth and depth of determining about the disorders.
5. Makes use of evidence to plight- clear up: Contain you constructed-in quantitative and qualitative evidence? Contain you analysed the evidence?
20 No evidence or repeats evidence with no diagnosis. Basically descriptive without reference to principle and evidence, lacks sufficient diagnosis to enhance conclusion
Introduces some evidence nonetheless fails to clearly link this to diagnosis or conclusion
Applies some evidence to reveal judgement, reflects on strengths of the evidence and links this to diagnosis or conclusions
Insightful and detailed evidence equipped. Applies evidence and contains lovely interpretation of qualitative and quantitative files to reveal judgement and clear conclusions
Applies evidence, alongside with lovely interpretation of files, reflects on evidence to reveal diagnosis of alternatives and threats, provides sensible conclusions
Marking rubric for file 1
Marking rubric for file 2
- WE OFFER THE BEST CUSTOM PAPER WRITING SERVICES. WE HAVE DONE THIS QUESTION BEFORE, WE CAN ALSO DO IT FOR YOU.
- Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts
- (USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)
- CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS
QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO ChatGPT.NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER
Looking for unparalleled custom paper writing services? Our team of experienced professionals at AcademicWritersBay.com is here to provide you with top-notch assistance that caters to your unique needs.
We understand the importance of producing original, high-quality papers that reflect your personal voice and meet the rigorous standards of academia. That’s why we assure you that our work is completely plagiarism-free—we craft bespoke solutions tailored exclusively for you.
Why Choose AcademicWritersBay.com?
- Our papers are 100% original, custom-written from scratch.
- We’re here to support you around the clock, any day of the year.
- You’ll find our prices competitive and reasonable.
- We handle papers across all subjects, regardless of urgency or difficulty.
- Need a paper urgently? We can deliver within 6 hours!
- Relax with our on-time delivery commitment.
- We offer money-back and privacy guarantees to ensure your satisfaction and confidentiality.
- Benefit from unlimited amendments upon request to get the paper you envisioned.
- We pledge our dedication to meeting your expectations and achieving the grade you deserve.
Our Process: Getting started with us is as simple as can be. Here’s how to do it:
- Click on the “Place Your Order” tab at the top or the “Order Now” button at the bottom. You’ll be directed to our order form.
- Provide the specifics of your paper in the “PAPER DETAILS” section.
- Select your academic level, the deadline, and the required number of pages.
- Click on “CREATE ACCOUNT & SIGN IN” to provide your registration details, then “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT.”
- Follow the simple payment instructions and soon, our writers will be hard at work on your paper.
AcademicWritersBay.com is dedicated to expediting the writing process without compromising on quality. Our roster of writers boasts individuals with advanced degrees—Masters and PhDs—in a myriad of disciplines, ensuring that no matter the complexity or field of your assignment, we have the expertise to tackle it with finesse. Our quick turnover doesn’t mean rushed work; it means efficiency and priority handling, ensuring your deadlines are met with the excellence your academics demand.
