To total this project, review the advised and grading rubric

CYB 200 Mission Three Pointers and Rubric

Overview

Even handed one of the three focus projects for this path is crea�ng a technical brief based mostly on the research you’ve performed. The viewers for this brief is the protection or IT director for the fic�onal

organiza�on for which you’re employed. This technical brief will reduction because the conception for a proac�ve adversarial detec�on thought that your director shall be crea�ng. The last product represents an

authen�c demonstra�on of competency because, as a security analyst, you beget gotten to develop skills that use a diversity of programs and tools to detect, signify, and counter cyber threat

actors. Your work will make contributions to larger crew projects across your organiza�on. This venture will moreover enable you develop an extraordinarily noteworthy mindset: pondering responsibly and proac�vely about

what threat actors would execute to a�ack organiza�onal sources.

The venture contains one milestone, which is intelligent to be submi�ed in Module 5. The venture shall be submi�ed in Module Seven.

On this project, which you can perhaps show your mastery of the next path competency:

Place legit, ethical guidelines on how to detect, signify, and counter cyber threat actors

Inform of affairs

In a path announcement, your trainer will provide some scenarios so that you can make a selection from. To your chosen scenario, which you might as well very successfully be a security analyst, crea�ng a technical brief for the protection or

IT director explaining how the situa�on informs the larger proac�ve adversarial detec�on thought they are wri�ng for the organiza�on. The reveal technical informa�on, outcomes, or

determina�ons you’d like are equipped at some point of the scenario. Your brief ought to address every cri�cal ingredient in the Mission Three advised, discussing your easiest-prac�ce tac�cs or programs

recommenda�ons based mostly for your research from the resolution point to you the solution to carried out because the milestone for this venture. The Conclusion sec�on of this ac�vity requires you to increase for your total

research you presumably did for the resolution abet.

Prompt

To your technical brief, you beget gotten to address the cri�cal ingredients listed below.

I. Introduc�on

A. Iden�fy your threat actors and signify their mo�va�ons or desired outcomes. Use research from the Mission Three helpful resource manual or resolution abet to toughen your response.

As an illustration, is the threat actor gathering informa�on for monetary have?

II. Diagnosis

A. Characterize easiest prac�ces or programs for detec�ng the threat actors from the scenario. Use research from the Mission Three helpful resource manual or resolution abet to toughen your

response.



10/15/24, 11:25 AM Task Recordsdata

https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/le/content material/1698647/viewContent/35102840/Survey 1/3

B. Characterize ethical and upright components that wishes to be thought to be and their significance when it comes to the firm for which which you might as well very successfully be employed in the scenario. Use research from the

Mission Three helpful resource manual or resolution abet to toughen your response.

C. Characterize now not now not up to one tac�c or map that is obligatory in responding to and countering this threat actor. Use research from the Mission Three helpful resource manual or resolution abet to

toughen your response.

D. Characterize now not now not up to one tac�c or map that might perhaps be employed to lower the likelihood of the identical situa�on taking place again. Use research from the Mission Three helpful resource

manual or resolution abet to toughen your response.

III. Conclusion

A. Expose the poten�al ramifica�ons of the tac�cs or programs you beget gotten urged. Use research from the helpful resource manual or resolution abet to toughen your response.

What to Submit

Your submission wishes to be approximately 2 pages in length (plus a duvet page and references) and desires to be wri�en in APA layout. Use double spacing, 12-point Cases Recent Roman font,

and one-saunter margins. Consist of now not now not up to three references, which wishes to be cited according to APA style. Use a file name that involves the path code, the project �tle, and your name—for

example, CYB_200_Project_Three_Neo_Anderson.docx.

Mission Three Rubric

Criteria Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Desires Enchancment (55%) No longer Evident (0%) Label

Introduc�on: Represent Meets “Proficient” standards and

addresses cri�cal ingredient in an

excep�onally sure, insigh�ul,

sophis�cated, or crea�ve

formula

Iden�fies threat actors and

characterizes their mo�va�ons

or desired outcomes, the use of

research from the helpful resource

manual or resolution abet to toughen

the response

Addresses “Proficient” standards,

but there are gaps in readability,

common sense, or detail

Would now not address cri�cal

ingredient, or response is

irrelevant

16

Diagnosis: Detec�ng Menace

Actors

Meets “Proficient” standards and

addresses cri�cal ingredient in an

excep�onally sure, insigh�ul,

sophis�cated, or crea�ve

formula

Describes easiest prac�ces or

programs for detec�ng the

threat actors, the use of research

from the helpful resource manual or

resolution abet to toughen the

response

Addresses “Proficient” standards,

but there are gaps in readability,

common sense, or detail

Would now not address cri�cal

ingredient, or response is

irrelevant

16

10/15/24, 11:25 AM Task Recordsdata

https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/le/content material/1698647/viewContent/35102840/Survey 2/3

Criteria Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Desires Enchancment (55%) No longer Evident (0%) Label

Diagnosis: Ethical and Apt

Components

Meets “Proficient” standards and

addresses cri�cal ingredient in an

excep�onally sure, insigh�ul,

sophis�cated, or crea�ve

formula

Describes ethical and upright

components that favor to be

thought to be and their

significance, the use of research

from the helpful resource manual or

resolution abet to toughen the

response

Addresses “Proficient” standards,

but there are gaps in readability,

common sense, or detail

Would now not address cri�cal

ingredient, or response is

irrelevant

16

Diagnosis: Responding to and

Countering Menace Actor

Meets “Proficient” standards and

addresses cri�cal ingredient in an

excep�onally sure, insigh�ul,

sophis�cated, or crea�ve

formula

Describes now not now not up to one tac�c or

map that is obligatory in

responding to and countering

the threat actor, the use of research

from the helpful resource manual or

resolution abet to toughen the

response

Addresses “Proficient” standards,

but there are gaps in readability,

common sense, or detail

Would now not address cri�cal

ingredient, or response is

irrelevant

16

Diagnosis: Slice lend a hand Likelihood Meets “Proficient” standards and

addresses cri�cal ingredient in an

excep�onally sure, insigh�ul,

sophis�cated, or crea�ve

formula

Describes now not now not up to one tac�c or

map that might perhaps be

employed to lower the

likelihood of the identical situa�on

taking place again, the use of

research from the helpful resource

manual or resolution abet to toughen

the response

Addresses “Proficient” standards,

but there are gaps in readability,

common sense, or detail

Would now not address cri�cal

ingredient, or response is

irrelevant

16

Conclusions: Ramifica�ons Meets “Proficient” standards and

addresses cri�cal ingredient in an

excep�onally sure, insigh�ul,

sophis�cated, or crea�ve

formula

Explains the poten�al

ramifica�ons of the tac�cs or

programs urged, the use of

research from the helpful resource

manual or resolution abet to toughen

the response

Addresses “Proficient” standards,

but there are gaps in readability,

common sense, or detail

Would now not address cri�cal

ingredient, or response is

irrelevant

16

Ar�cula�on of Response Submission is free of errors

connected to cita�ons, grammar,

spelling, and organiza�on and

is presented in a skilled

and easy-to-read layout

Submission has no most fundamental errors

connected to cita�ons, grammar,

spelling, or organiza�on

Submission has some errors

connected to cita�ons, grammar,

spelling, or organiza�on that

nega�vely affect readability

and ar�cula�on of most fundamental ideas

Submission has cri�cal errors

connected to cita�ons, grammar,

spelling, or organiza�on that

prevent realizing of ideas

4

Total: 100%

10/15/24, 11:25 AM Task Recordsdata

https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/le/content material/1698647/viewContent/35102840/Survey 3/3